-
Recent Posts
Recent Comments
- survey and recap of the year’s events | LitHub@Hunter on précis of “Research across the English curriculum” workshop (3/13)
- new 285 group + site – English 285 at Hunter College on 285 FAQs
- Paul McPherron on social annotation with students using hypothes.is
- Karen Greenberg on engaging students semi-synchronously: the “puzzle” approach
- Jeff Allred on survey results are in…
Archives
- March 2026
- February 2026
- January 2026
- May 2025
- April 2025
- March 2025
- February 2025
- January 2025
- November 2024
- October 2024
- September 2024
- May 2024
- March 2024
- February 2024
- January 2024
- October 2023
- September 2023
- August 2023
- May 2023
- March 2023
- February 2023
- January 2023
- February 2021
- October 2020
- September 2020
- August 2020
- December 2019
- October 2019
- May 2019
- March 2019
- February 2019
- January 2019
- December 2018
- November 2018
- October 2018
- September 2018
- August 2018
- July 2018
- June 2018
Categories
Meta
Tags
- 306
- ACERT
- annotation
- assessment
- asynchronous
- attendance
- collaboration
- Commons
- conferences
- covid
- digital humanities
- discussion
- distance learning
- dropbox
- extracurricular
- Freud
- funding
- grading
- grants
- Hunter
- hypothes.is
- lectures
- library
- low-stakes writing
- Marx
- meta
- NYT
- OER
- participation
- play
- policy
- primary sources
- research
- small teaching
- student-centered pedagogy
- student engagement
- syllabus
- Think-Pair-Share
- tools
- ungrading
- video
- workshops
- writing
- writing pedagogy
- zoom
Author Archives: Mark Miller
There is no Being, just the Deed
For those of us with a creeping sense of being cast on the wheel of fortune, our colleague A.W. Strouse offers a welcome tonic in Gender Trouble Couplets: Volume 1. Inspired by the once-maligned form of medieval versified encyclopedias, Gender … Continue reading
Posted in Uncategorized
Leave a comment
In the news, but not of the news
In his recent essay “William Wordsworth Saves the Internet,” our colleague Fiore Sireci shows the value of public humanities for cultural criticism. Sireci works at the intersection of Romanticist literary criticism, book history, and the digital humanities to show us … Continue reading
Posted in Uncategorized
Leave a comment

